Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Drew v. Robertson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05694
Petitioner: Karl D. Drew
Respondent: Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drew v. USA
as 4:2022cv00363
Petitioner: Jose D Drew
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Karl Drew v. Jim Robertson
as 22-15447
Petitioner / Appellant: KARL D. DREW
Respondent / Appellee: JIM ROBERTSON, Warden
Drew #048508 v. Paul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01488
Plaintiff: Tommy D Drew
Defendant: Theodora Paul, Renae Furar, Donna Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drew v. Robertson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01889
Plaintiff: Karl D. Drew
Defendant: Jim Roberts and Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Banks v. Kelly Forbes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7207
Petitioner - Appellant: FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee: KELLY FORBES, FMC Butner, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, MARK HORNAK and others
Battle v. Drew
as 1:2017cv02140
Petitioner: William L. Battle
Respondent: D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv11049
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv01926
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv03916
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Kelly Forbes , United States Marshals Service , Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?