Cases 31 - 40 of 2,570
Smith v. UST - United States Trustee, Phoenix
as 24-169
Appellant:
JIMMIE D. SMITH
Appellee:
UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, PHOENIX
Smith v. UST - United States Trustee, Phoenix
as 24-174
Appellant:
JIMMIE D. SMITH
Appellee:
UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, PHOENIX
Kipkoech v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
Joe R. Kipkoech and Job R. Kipkoech
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Office of Attorney General, John Lentz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Value Recapture Partners LLC v. The Boeing Company et al
as 1:2023cv16550
Plaintiff:
Value Recapture Partners LLC
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, Gregory D. Smith and Dennis A. Muilenburg
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COLLAZO v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv22777
Plaintiff:
ISHAWN A. COLLAZO
Defendant:
D. SMITH, MR. PATTERSON and SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Parker v. Stephen Meiko, et al
as 23-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN MEIKO, in his individual capacity as a Registered Nurse for Michigan Department of Corrections, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, in her individual capacity as Warden of Alger Correctional Facility, DOUG TASSON, in his individual capacity as Deputy Warden for Alger Correctional Facility and others
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv06135
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Russell A Robinson and Equaan D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
