Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Kevin R. Schrubb, I v. D.C. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00799
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Schrubb, I
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. C. Davis and Z. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Meredith et al
as 7:2018cv00535
Defendant:
Hensley, Mr. Rivero, Mr. Marcus Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Monroe et al
as 6:2017cv00545
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
C.E. Monroe, D. C. Cockrell and T. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Ortega v. Volunteers of America et al
as 3:2017cv01613
Plaintiff:
Freddy L. Rodriguez-Ortega
Defendant:
Volunteers of America, Mr. Maldonado and M. D. C Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bart McClain v. Pat McCrory
as 16-7570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT MCCRORY, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE SOLOMON and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and COLUMBUS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Durbin v. District Attorney et al
as 5:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael Durbin
Defendant:
Office of 26th J D C District Attorney and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Cox et al
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Marvin D Guy
Defendant:
Office of 6th J D C District Attorney, Unknown Officers and Larry G Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena
as 15-7057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. LOVINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, OFFICER D. C. DUPIE, OFFICER J. DOOLEY and others
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meade v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael Meade
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Sutton, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
