Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Laramore v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11201
Plaintiff:
Easter Laramore
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cary v. Muttenlocker et al
as 2:2026cv13433
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary
Defendant:
Brian Muttenlocker, Easter and Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Alford v. Shoop et al
as 2:2026cv01117
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Tim Shoop, N. Maghee, U.L. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tegoseak v. Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv00303
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Dee Tegoseak
Defendant:
Anchorage Police Department, Sean Case and Catherine M. Easter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASTER v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2026cv00189
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY ANN EASTER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perez v. Torres, et al
as 26-3156
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN TORRES, MONICA TORRES, SHANNON MARTEN and others
Johnson et al v. Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2026cv01215
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson and Alyssa Nida
Defendant:
Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners, Jeff Easter, VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Easter v. USA
as 5:2026cv02459
Plaintiff:
Shimeshia Easter
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reed v. Rochester, City of et al
as 2:2026cv00311
Plaintiff:
James Rodric Reed
Defendant:
Rochester, City of, Andrew Shotts, Bryce Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tegoseak v. Office of Special Prosecutions et al
as 3:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Tegoseak
Defendant:
Office of Special Prosecutions, Easter and Lindsey Maguigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
