Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin v. Cabraser et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Billy F. Larkin
Defendant: Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Krsitopher S. Ritter, Stephen J. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00959
Petitioner: Robert D Rice
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABREGO et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv08190
Plaintiff: JOSEPH ABREGO, ANTONIO AGUILAR, JOSE R AGUILERA and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03495
Plaintiff: ROBERT D RICE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff: Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff: Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Markese Rice v. Kenneth Diggs
as 23-6690
Petitioner / Appellant: MARKESE D. RICE
Respondent / Appellee: KENNETH DIGGS
Rice v. Idleberg et al
as 1:2023cv04340
Plaintiff: Craig D. Rice
Defendant: John D. Idleberg, Papanos, Taryn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Diggs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00355
Petitioner: Markese D. Rice
Respondent: Kenneth Diggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?