Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Mael v Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gordon Mael
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Robert A Martin, Chatham D Reeve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves et al v. Statebridge Company, LLC
as 3:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reeves and Dana D. Reeves
Defendant:
Statebridge Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reeves #263041 v. Federal Public Defenders Office
as 2:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Reeves
Defendant:
Federal Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REEVES v. SHOEMAKER
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
YUSUF D. REEVES
Defendant:
BROOKE SHOEMAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Octaivian Reeves v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OCTAIVIAN D. REEVES
Defendant:
TONY PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PARRIS, Warden, LIEUTENANT CHARLES WALLS, Guard, TYLER LONGMIRE, Correctional Officer and others
United States v. Kelton Reeves
as 21-3721
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kelton D. Reeves
Reeves v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv01163
Plaintiff:
Octaivian D. Reeves
Defendant:
Jimmy Turner, G.A. Puryear, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45805
Plaintiff:
MARCUS D REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sadaira Reeves v. Solidarity House, et al
as 21-1075
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and SOLIDARITY HOUSE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SADAIRA D. REEVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
