Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rose v. Mooresville Police Department
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Rose
Defendant:
Mooresville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Hymon v. Steps et al
as 2:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
Roderick Hymon
Defendant:
Julie Steps, Police D. Rose, Morgan Lambardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Miller et al
as 5:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Becky Pasternik-Ikard
Plaintiff:
Shawn Trey Miller, Paul Baker, Michael Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. Roe et al
as 2:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Roe, Dean Borsos, David Hecht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Law v. Patillo et al
as 1:2017cv01953
Plaintiff:
Lauren A. Law
Defendant:
Darius Patillo, Ernest D. Blount, B. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 2:2014cv01827
Defendant:
Clark County, Nevada, Douglas C. Gillespie, Officer Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
John A Gonzales and Terresa Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez et al. v. Wasko, et al.
as 1:2014cv01705
Plaintiff:
Juanita Lopez and Consuelo Romero
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, David M. Zupan, Randy Lind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rose v. City of Pittsfield et al
as 3:2012cv30062
Plaintiff:
Michael D Rose
Defendant:
City of Pittsfield, James Ruberto, Michael Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
