Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Sidney Harr v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D. and others
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE PAUL TREVOR SHARP
Schroeder et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23590
Plaintiff:
Valerie A. Schroeder and Gary D. Schroeder
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Green v. Steven Chvala, et al
as 13-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN T. CHVALA, JUSTIN L. GRACIS, BROOKE LOMAS and others
HARR v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Christopher Headen v. USA, et al
as 13-5131
Petitioner - Appellant:
Christopher Mark Headen
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Thomas D. Schroeder
HEADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00547
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MARK HEADEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2012cv02020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martin D Schroeder, Janet R Schroeder and Bank of America N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SCHROEDER v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68347
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. SCHROEDER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCHROEDER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54859
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D SCHROEDER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCHROEDER et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv32775
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D SCHROEDER and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
