Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kearney v. Thompson et al
as 2:2026cv01260
Defendant:
Officer Everhart, Officer Wilson and Officer Thompson
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kearney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth A. Thomas MD, LLC v. Curative Inc.
as 1:2026cv03130
Defendant:
Curative Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Thomas MD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cumbie v. Meink
as 1:2026cv04652
Defendant:
Honorable Troy E. Meink
Plaintiff:
Technical Sergeant Thomas D. Cumbie
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Cislo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02604
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Cislo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06677
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
D.C. v. Bergmann et al
as 3:2026cv02467
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Thomas McLay, Thomas Jost and others
Plaintiff:
D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06674
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Schnetzer v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv01038
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Schnetzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
