Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Thorpe v. GEO Group, Inc.
as 8:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Travis Dramaine Thorpe
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Repard et al
as 4:2026cv01716
Plaintiff:
Lamont Haywood
Defendant:
Robert L. Repard, Jeffrey L. Mensch, Officer Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01594
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hassan Aoun v. Dearborn Public School Board of Education, et al
as 26-1533
Plaintiff:
HASSAN NAZIH AOUN
Defendant:
DEARBORN PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF DEARBORN, MI, CITY OF DEARBORN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Haley Thorpe v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00369
Plaintiff:
Haley Thorpe
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Baez v. Thorpe
as 1:2026cv04047
Petitioner:
Anthony Baez
Respondent:
Supt. Bennie Thorpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesson et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04511
Plaintiff:
Brayon Wesson, Sr, Roshan Smith, Amy Lynn Keeton and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aoun v. Dearborn Public School Board of Education et al
as 2:2026cv11470
Defendant:
Dearborn Public School Board of Education, Dearborn, City of, Dearborn Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Hassan Aoun [E-Filer]
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fink v. Rommel et al
as 9:2026cv00793
Plaintiff:
David Fink
Defendant:
Rachel Rommel, Lt. Fountain, Kierpiec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
