Cases 1 - 10 of 433
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATCHER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Hatcher, Carolyn J. Hatcher, BENJAMIN D HATCHER and others
Defendant:
Joseph D. Thompson, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOSEPH D THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thompson v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Latrese D. Thompson
Defendant:
Virginia Unemployment Commission and Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Block v. Bradshaw
as 9:2023cv81497
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Block
Defendant:
Richard Bradshaw et al, Palm Beach County Sheriff and Desmond D. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thompson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03556
Plaintiff:
Jamel D. Thompson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
