Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Grampus v. DW et al
as 6:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus
Defendant:
Harouff DW, R Blakey, Sgt Zappola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. The City of Raleigh
as 5:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kesha L Knight
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh, D. W. Deach, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
D.W. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
D. W.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, SERGEANT D. W. COOKE, OFFICER W. M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Satterfield et al
as 5:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
William John Clark and William John Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
D. W. Satterfield, W. S. Weakley, West Virginia State Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Stanley et al
as 7:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rai' Quan Turner
Defendant:
Officer D. W. McMurray and Officer M. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pleasant v. Call
as 3:2019cv00684
Petitioner:
Sylvester F. Pleasant, Jr.
Respondent:
D. W. Call
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sylvester Pleasant, Jr. v. D. Call
as 19-7277
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN D. W. CALL, Nottoway Corr. Ctr
Petitioner / Appellant:
SYLVESTER F. PLEASANT, JR.
Sylvester Pleasant , Jr. v. D. Call
as 19-6963
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN D. W. CALL, Nottoway Corr. Ctr
Petitioner / Appellant:
SYLVESTER F. PLEASANT, JR.
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
