Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Warwick v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04503
Plaintiff:
Teresa D. Warwick
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Files v. King et al
as 1:2016cv01952
Plaintiff:
Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant:
Julian M King, State of Alabama, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Talladega County Jail et al
as 1:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Tredrick Jackson
Defendant:
Talladega County Jail and D. Warwick
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Warwick v. Maricopa County Jail
as 2:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
James D Warwick
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
