Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Atkins v. Sykes
as 21-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES, JUDGE WILLIAM J. BAUER, JUDGE JOEL M. FLAUM and others
ATKINS v. SYKES et al
as 1:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE S. SYKES, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKS v. HORN, et al
as 2:2018cv00312
Defendant:
DANIEL A MANION, GREGORY HORN, DIANE P. WOOD and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Horn
as 1:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Daniel A Manion, Gregory Horn, Richard Posner and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin-El v. Ellitt et al
as 2:2016cv12861
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Erwin-El
Defendant:
Mary Jane Ellitt, Midland Funding LLC, Michigan Department of Treasury and others
Quordalis Sanders v. William Duffin, et al
as 16-1027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN, DANIEL A. MANION, CALAR HARTMANT and others
Frank Stork v. Jeff Sanford, et al
as 12-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK E. STORK
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF SANFORD, City Attorney, NICHOLAS MCKINLEY, Police Officer South Bend Police, GREG ZOELLER, Indiana Attorney General and others
Frank Stork v. Jeff Sanford, et al
as 12-2548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK E. STORK
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF SANFORD, City Attorney, NICHOLAS MCKINLEY, Police Officer South Bend Police, GREG ZOELLER, Indiana Attorney General and others
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 5:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
John Ley, William T Moore, G R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
