Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tonya Udoh, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 17-3256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tonya Udoh and Emem Ufot Udoh, individually, and on behalf of their minor children, K.K.W. and K.C.W.
Defendant - Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Charles E. Johnson, Donothan R. Bartley and others
Udoh et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv03119
Plaintiff:
Tonya Udoh and Emem Udoh
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Charles E. Johnson , Donothan Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv02785
Plaintiff:
Leo Lionel Payne
Defendant:
Daniel E Johnson, Reinold M Adams and Ryan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Helder
as 5:2014cv05324
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al. Lott et al
as 3:2011cv03374
Plaintiff:
Earl O Graham , Sr, E O G and B J G
Defendant:
Leon Lott and Daniel E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Smith v. Jon Ozmint
as 10-6526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Al-Ogaidi v. Johnson et al
as 1:2008cv00844
Plaintiff:
Sa'adoon Ali Hameed Al-Ogaidi
Defendant:
Daniel E Johnson, CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Al-Ogaidi v. Johnson et al
as 2:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
Sa'adoon Ali Hameed Al-Ogaidi
Defendant:
Daniel E Johnson, CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kevin Smith v. Lester Hinson, Jr.
as 07-6558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
