Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hyman v. New Mexico State University, et al
as 26-2157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. HYMAN
Defendant:
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY, THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT HEAD DAVID DANIEL and others
Witt v. Milby et al
as 1:2026cv01233
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Witt
Defendant:
Robert Milby, Sgt. Adam Verkey, Danielle James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fredrickson v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2026cv01350
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fredrickson
Counter-Defendant:
Daniel James Caldwell, I, Jennifer Zimmerman, Melinda Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Cruz et al v. Anthropic PBC
as 5:2026cv04482
Plaintiff:
Angie Cruz, Sean Arbabi, Ascalon, LLC and others
Defendant:
Anthropic PBC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Witt v. Milby et al
as 9:2026cv00637
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Witt
Defendant:
Robert Milby, Sgt. Adam Verkey, Danielle James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Riley, et al v. Phoenix Community Capital, et al
as 26-5263
Plaintiff:
RODNEY RILEY, DANIEL MEGIBBEN, NICHOLAS SGHERZI and others
Defendant:
PHOENIX COMMUNITY CAPITAL, XETA CAPITAL LLC, MATTHEW SGHERZI and others
Contract Lumber Inc et al v. James et al
as 2:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
Contract Lumber Inc and Contract Lumber South Inc
Defendant:
Daniel James and Carter Lumber of the South Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
James v. Lee et al
as 5:2026cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel James
Defendant:
Khoa Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
