Cases 21 - 30 of 54
BURTON v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP
Plaintiff:
DAVID BURTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burton v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv03681
Plaintiff:
David Burton
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FRASSETTO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv06960
Petitioner:
LISA M FRASSETTO and SCOTT FRASSETTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID BURTON and H. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Fish et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
David Burton Fish and Jill Broome Fish
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. v. Burton Holdings LLC et al
as 0:2014cv62564
Plaintiff:
Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Burton Holdings LLC , David Burton , Ralph Santell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
State Farm Fire and Casualty C v. Ronald Nivens
as 14-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD B. NIVENS, LAURIE HATCHER, HOPE L. HUBBARD and others
BURTON v. BOSTON RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC
as 1:2014cv01779
Plaintiff:
DAVID BURTON
Defendant:
BOSTON RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
