Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Gonzales #284159 v. Mayes et al
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
David Lopez Gonzales
Defendant:
Kris Mayes, Rachel Mitchell, Amanda M Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cranford v. Negrete et al
as 2:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cranford
Defendant:
David Lopez Negrete, Kerry L. Earley and Steven Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2023cv01225
Petitioner:
Daivid Lopez and David Lopez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Vink v. Joseph Natole, et al
as 22-2159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN VINK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH NATOLE, M.D., DAVID LOPEZ, R.N., JENIFFER [UNKNOWN], R.N. and others
Lopez v. Porter County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Defendant:
Porter County Jail and Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Hertor David Lopez Martinez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Muskegon, County of, Michael Poulin and others
Plaintiff:
Gracie Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
