Cases 1 - 10 of 19
A.Z v. Alpine School District et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
AZ
Defendant:
Alpine School District, Ryan Burke, Kathy Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEPTEMBER et al v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2023cv21415
Plaintiff:
MCDOWELL SEPTEMBER and ROBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF GIACOMMO SACCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hanks v. Turner et al
as 2:2019cv05767
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, David Turner, Monica Lindstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Bob L Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higbee v. Eastern Michigan University
as 2:2018cv13761
Defendant:
Eastern Michigan University, James Webb, Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Higbee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2016cv03962
Plaintiff:
Joseph David Turner
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of and Sara L. Grewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Louisiana Workforce, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Paul Cook
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana Workforce, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pinney v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Larry Delbert Pinney, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The , Chuck Jordan , Wyett C Poth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Varnell et al v. Turner et al
as 1:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
Carla Varnell
Defendant:
Grant Stewart, David Turner and James F. Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
