Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tsatryan v. Fernandez, et al.
as 24-6898
Defendant:
DIANA JUMATAER, MAYA SHULMAN, MARK JUHAS and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR TSATRYAN
Arthur Tsatryan v. Steven Paul Fernandez et al
as 2:2024cv08947
Defendant:
Fernandez and Karney A Professional Law Corporation, Dennis P. Block and Associates APC., Maya Shulman and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Tsatryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SWIFT v. REAVES
as 1:2020cv01737
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. SWIFT
Defendant:
A. REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Sayulita Fine Foods
as 3:2019cv01161
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Sayulita Fine Foods
Plaintiff:
David A Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00311
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
David A Swift
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Swift v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00867
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
David A Swift
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Karlin v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Muriel Karlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Geller v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, R. Halsey Wise, Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Geller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Swift v. A F C O Industries Inc
as 1:2017cv00373
Defendant:
A F C O Industries Inc
Plaintiff:
David G Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Swift v. Van Buren County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
David Dean Swift
Defendant:
Van Buren County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
