Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Royer v. Elkhart City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff: Andrew Royer
Defendant: Elkhart City of, Carlton Conway, Mark Daggy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant: Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff: Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00809
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edward Dennis Chapman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dennis Chapman v. ImpactOffice LLC
as 17-1691
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS CHAPMAN
Plaintiff: ERICA KNOTT
Defendant - Appellee: IMPACTOFFICE LLC
Dennis Chapman v. ImpactOffice LLC
as 17-1635
Plaintiff - Appellee: DENNIS CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellant: IMPACTOFFICE LLC
Chapman v. ImpactOffice LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv01851
Plaintiff: Dennis Chapman and Erica Knott
Defendant: ImpactOffice LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lana Canen v. Dennis Chapman
as 16-1621
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANA CANEN
Defendant / Appellee: DENNIS CHAPMAN, in his individual capacity as Deputy for the Elkhart County Sheriff Department
Lana Canen v. Dennis Chapman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANA CANEN
Defendant - Appellee: DENNIS CHAPMAN, in his individual capacity as Deputy for the Elkhart County Sheriff Department
In re: John Chapman
as 15-14456
Petitioner: In re: JOHN DENNIS CHAPMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chapman v. Shartle
as 4:2015cv00348
Petitioner: John Dennis Chapman
Respondent: JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?