Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gardner v. Mays
as 21-10346
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul L. Wright, Frank McKay, Police Officer-City of Southhaven Police Department, Earl Shannon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Detra Katrine Gardner
Lewis v. Salazar et al
as 2:2021cv02008
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Vermilion County Illinois, Stephane Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Keyvell Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Lacy et al
as 2:2020cv02128
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Danville Police Department, Illinois State Police and others
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Morgan, et al v. Rickey Williams, et al
as 19-2383
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS GARDNER, Clerk of the Court, RICKEY WILLIAMS, COUNTY OF VERMILION, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL R. FARROW, JR. and WILLIAM MORGAN
Ford v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Co et al
as 2:2019cv00748
Defendant:
National Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Dennis Gardner, D&B Gardner Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02143
Defendant:
Shayne Cassidy, Dennis Gardner, Michael Maria and others
Plaintiff:
William Morgan and Paul Farrow, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Power Pernonnel, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02847
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Stanford Health Care and Power Pernonnel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Lacy et al
as 2:2018cv02166
Plaintiff:
Marteaste Monkinzy Thompson
Defendant:
Jacqueline M Lacy and Dennis Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Gardner v. Thomas Barrett, et al
as 17-17283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BARRETT, TIM P. KAM, STEVEN DARDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
