Cases 71 - 80 of 433
The Vallejo Police Officers' Assoc. et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Shawny Williams, City of Vallejo, Hermie Sunga and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Nichelini and The Vallejo Police Officers' Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Dew v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01686
Plaintiff:
John Dew
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexis et al v. Dew Investments, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Ennis Weber, Dacia Weber, Dew Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jo A Alexis, Ruth Hampton and Tynecia Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02514
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN EDWARD DEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOCKBEE v. WEXFORD L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
WEXFORD L.L.C., ARAMARK L.L.C., KRISTEN DAUSS and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aples et al v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund et al
as 2:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Joseph Elfer, Sodexo, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alneisha Polite and Taivon Aples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Kincade et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Defendant:
T.A. Carroll, Stacy Kincade, Shabaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Mescall v. BOP, et al
as 20-2125
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR ELLISON, CASE MANAGER G. DEW, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN F. MESCALL
DEWS v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv05135
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DARRYL (WEST) DEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
