Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Curtis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10585
Plaintiff:
Donna Curtis and Ellen R. Cook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS v. COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
DONNA CURTIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Curtis v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv00400
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Donna Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Derek Montez v. Cody Hampton, et al
as 13-20331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK WAYNE MONTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CODY HAMPTON, CLARA ANDERSON, BRUCE BAGGETT and others
Montez v. Hampton et al
as 4:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
Derek Wayne Montez
Defendant:
Cody Hampton, Clara Anderson, Bruce Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dianna Johnson, et al v. Government of the DC, et al
as 11-5115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dianna Johnson, Carolyn Montgomery, Donna Curtis, On behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rubbiya Muhammed, Dianne Wilkes, Vickie Brooks and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Government of the District of Columbia and Todd Dillard, Individually and Officially, United States Marshal, D.C. Superior Court
Curtis-Robinson et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02402
Plaintiff:
Donna Curtis-Robinson and Joseph Robinson
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curtis-Robinson et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Donna Curtis-Robinson and Joseph Robinson
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2002cv02364
Plaintiff:
DIANNA JOHNSON , RUBBIYA MUHAMMED , CAROLYN MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
TODD DILLARD
Cross_defendant:
TODD DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
