Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ekeh v. Grunder et al
as 6:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ekeh
Defendant:
Brian Grunder, (fnu) Bogo, Jan Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbour v. Pratt, et al
as 26-4104
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BARBOUR
Defendant:
OFFICER STEPHEN PRATT, UTAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID O. LEAVITT and others
Smith v. SCI-Huntingdon
as 3:2025cv02501
Plaintiff:
Douglas Preston Smith
Defendant:
SCI-Huntingdon, Gabrielle Smith, Jaclyn Talasky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fluker v. Smith et al.
as 1:2025cv02762
Defendant:
Douglas G. Smith, Kelly Rose and Monetta Ervin
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fluker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv00241
Plaintiff:
Douglas Michael Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Thomas v. Keith et al.
as 1:2025cv01704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Thomas
Defendant:
Devin Keith, John Doe, Steven Mandusic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2025cv02518
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dontae Smith
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Unknown Crites, Unknown Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbour v. Pratt et al
as 2:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barbour
Defendant:
S Pratt, David O. Leavitt, Stephen Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blue Indie Realty, Inc. v. Hawthorne Ventures, LP et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Blue Indie Realty, Inc.
Defendant:
Hawthorne Ventures, LP, Hawthorne Income Funds, LLC and Douglas Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
