Cases 21 - 30 of 1,206
Dykes #201541 v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes #201541
Defendant:
Michael Brown, Heidi E. Washington, Billie Orsborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack and Van Dyke Mini Mart, LLC v Detroit, City of
as 2:2024cv10260
Plaintiff:
Mack and Van Dyke Mini Mart, LLC
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre, Dr. Larson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Roy Dykes
as 24-6029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY LEE DYKES
Dykes v. BP Expl & Prod
as 24-30002
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dykes
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP Pipeline Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-7973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, ESQ.
Defendant / Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ALPHABET INC., GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP and others
Van Dyke v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16539
Plaintiff:
Brandy Van Dyke
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Draper v. Wellpath, LLC et al.
as 4:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Draper
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Nurse Turner, Nurse Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
