Cases 1 - 10 of 1,206
Dykes v. Dutton et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lane Dykes, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Dutton, Officer Flippin, Detective Dalton Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANTZLER v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE H. FOSTER and WILLIAMS DYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. MURZIKE et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation et al v. Carter Bank & Trust et al
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation, James C. Justice Companies, Inc., Twin Fir Estates, LLC and others
Defendant:
Carter Bank & Trust, Carter Bankshares, Inc., Litz H. Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1972 Typing Arrangement Act
Leann Dykes v. National Institutes of Health, et al
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
Leann M. Dykes
Defendant:
National Institutes of Health, NatIonal Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Dyke v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Timothy Van Dyke
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Johnston v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv05271
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Nelson, Frank Gilletti, Heather Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
