Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Richardson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-01963
Plaintiff:
Dale Richardson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Richardson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Dale Richardson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
F.H.H. et al v. Carlson et al
as 3:2013cv05235
Plaintiff:
F.H.H. and Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Gary Carlson and Tami Merriman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Karamu House, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Karamu House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Richardson v. Inmate Records Supervisor et al
as 4:2012cv03498
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Inmate Records Supervisor, Kela Thomas, Valerie Suber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richardson v. Haley et al
as 4:2012cv02850
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Kela Thomas, Valerie Suber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson v. Reynolds
as 4:2012cv00948
Petitioner:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Respondent:
Cecilia R Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02672
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
