Cases 11 - 20 of 231
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Catherine C. Smith and Daniel J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
USA v. Smith
as 23-50052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Marquez v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Misael Nunez Marquez
Defendant:
Daniel B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
as 2:2022cv04669
Plaintiff:
Daniel V. Smith
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Smith v. Osmon et al
as 2:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Smith
Defendant:
Osmon, Angie Hood-Medland, Deepak Mohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kijuan Sharp v. Howard Turner
as 22-6952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIJUAN HAASSAN SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD TURNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, PITT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, LIEUTENANT ROUMPF and others
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14152
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRAIG SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2022cv02983
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R SMITH
Defendant:
STEPHEN S. MCKINNEY, DANIEL J. STICKNEY JR., FRANCIS D. PETERSON JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Daniel Smith, et al
as 22-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Isaac Smith and Endurance Broadcasting
Barnette v. Hill et al
as 7:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christine Barnette
Defendant:
Daniel Hill, Sarah Thompson and Daniel M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
