Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Beaty v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Markeon Person, Deon Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2020cv00184
Defendant:
KNOPP and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ADAM BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattress By Appointment LLC v. Adams
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
Daniel Adams
Plaintiff:
Mattress By Appointment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Epley v. Luong D.D.S. et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Tawana Lakesha Smith, MD, Wanda T. Hilliard, APRN, Julia Renee Ward, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Epley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09410
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DANIEL ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v Adams, et al.
as 1:2020cv00097
Defendant:
DANIEL ADAMS, State National Insurance Company, Inc. and FLOYD INC
Plaintiff:
DESHAUN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10907
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
The Estate of Michael Heiser et al v. Clearstream Banking, S.A.
as 1:2019cv11114
Petitioner:
Anthony W. Cartrette, Michael Morgera, The Estate of Earl F. Cartrette, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. Adams et al
as 6:2019cv01936
Defendant:
Daniel Adams and Larry Otting
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Main and Prospect Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09736
Defendant:
Main and Prospect Capital, LLC, Daniel Adam Hewko and Daniel Hewko
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
