Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acuna et al v. Pipefitters Local No. 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund Plan et al
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACUNA, DANIEL ARMSTRONG, DOUGLAS BARDY and others
Defendant:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND PLAN, Carl Evans, CHRIS FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00396
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Armstrong
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2021cv10293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Armstrong
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tripp v. Dornbush et al
as 4:2020cv04125
Defendant:
Joshua Westencurcher, John Holden, Daren Young and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Augustine et al
as 4:2020cv04116
Defendant:
John Benting, Richard Vestlie, Michael Leidhotl and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Tripp v. Tyler Cook, et al
as 20-2536
Defendant / Appellee:
Savannah Murray, Parole Board Member, in her individual and official capacity, Parole Board, in their individual and official capacity, Darin Young, Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Christopher Tripp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
