Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In re: Daniel Taylor
as 24-5757
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL BENSON TAYLOR
Respondent:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, Tennessee Attorney General
West Bend Insurance Company v. Benson, et al.
as 3:2024cv00405
Defendant:
NEWTON & SONS EXCAVATING, INC., DANIEL BENSON and JANET BENSON
Plaintiff:
WEST BEND INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Taylor v. Tennessee Department of Probation & Paroles
as 2:2023cv02767
Petitioner:
Daniel Benson Taylor
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Probation & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Billman v. Gutierrez
as 23-15076
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL BENSON BILLMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
GUTIERREZ, First name unknown; named as Warden Gutierrez, USP Tucson
Billman v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Daniel Benson Billman
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BENSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18570
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson v. Foster
as 2:2019cv00100
Respondent:
Warden Brian Foster and Brian Foster
Petitioner:
Richard Daniel Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. v. BURKHART, ET AL
as 1:2017cv03273
Defendant:
105210 INVESTMENTS LLC, 105214 INVESTMENTS LLC, ACCD LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schlangen et al v. Otterson et al
as 0:2017cv04225
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Schlangen and Kasie Rose Lydell
Defendant:
Nick Otterson, Scott Mackissock, Dave Kicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billman v. The United States Of America
as 2:2017cv00053
Petitioner:
Daniel Benson Billman
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
