Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Head v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-1663
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL NEWTON HEAD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Atkins v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Marvette Atkins as Personal Representative Estate of Daniel Newton Neal and Marvette Atkins
Defendant:
JG Bennett, RA Bias, M Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Head v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08048
Petitioner:
Daniel Newton Head
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv80200
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newton
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44324
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06345
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NEWTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91225
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NEWTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2016cv08489
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newton
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton et al v. Focused Recovery Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newton and Chrystina Newton
Defendant:
Focused Recovery Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Newton v. Crittenden County Detention Facility
as 3:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newton
Defendant:
Crittenden County Detention Facility and L Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
