Cases 31 - 40 of 1,187
Darden v. Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darden
Defendant:
Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. and Willie L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Dennis Darden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
David D'Amico v. Olive Garden et al
as 8:2023cv02440
Plaintiff:
David D'Amico
Defendant:
Olive Garden, Newkoa LLC and Darden Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN W. DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, VOLGEMAN, WIEGAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, BRANHAM, LUTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jayden Darden v. Correctional Officer Wilson, et al
as 23-3376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYDEN DARDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILSON, OFFICER KARGUS and OFFICER OGLSEBY
Jamal Gethers v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL NATHAN GETHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, DAVID ROBINSON, LESLIE FLEMING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
