Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Darnell v. Swan et al
as 6:2026cv00478
Petitioner:
Sherman L Darnell
Respondent:
Pamela Swan, Crystal Conklin, Brandi Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shobey v. City of Kent
as 2:2026cv02587
Plaintiff:
Darnell J Shobey
Defendant:
City of Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman Jr (PS) v. Smith
as 1:2026cv03257
Plaintiff:
Melvin Darnell Coleman Jr
Defendant:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv07434
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Darnell Greer
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Rainney v. Progressive Casualty Insurance et al
as 3:2026cv00687
Plaintiff:
Aaron Darnell Rainney
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance, A.W. Auto & Truck Wholesalers and KEMBA Roanoke Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2026cv00574
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Michael Campbell and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Greg Lovelace, John Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eggleston v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 6:2026cv00086
Plaintiff:
Linda Darnell Eggleston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rice v. OSH, Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2026cv01439
Plaintiff:
Alex Verlyn Lyle Rice, Alex T., Aaron and others
Defendant:
OSH, Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Moore et al
as 2:2026cv02849
Plaintiff:
Darnell Williams
Defendant:
Officer Moore and University of Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darnell Alexander
as 26-3623
Petitioner:
In re: DARNELL ALEXANDER
Respondent:
LISA STENSETH and STATE OF OHIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
