Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Murry v. Watkins et al
as 4:2026cv00948
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Darnell Murry, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Robert Doyal, Hunter Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2026cv04079
Plaintiff:
James D Scott and James Darnell Scott
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Palmer and Joel E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reel v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03206
Plaintiff:
Darnell Reel
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Dukes v. Stricklin, et al.
as 26-5997
Plaintiff:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant:
T. STRICKLIN, Correctional Sergeant, K. SPENCE, M. BLAKEE and others
Shivers v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01684
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Darnell Shivers
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Shivers v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03210
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Darnell Shivers
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Thomas v. Cabrera et al
as 4:2026cv10251
Petitioner:
Darnell Thomas
Respondent:
E. Cabrera, Howard E. Moseley, Chris Slino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Hart, et al
as 3:2026cv00921
Plaintiff:
Pedro Darnell Vaughan
Defendant:
Forest Hart, Sgt. Branch and Nurse/ Deputy Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv13401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
