Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Roudybush v. Duncan et al
as 6:2014cv01374
Plaintiff:
John Roudybush
Defendant:
Randy Duncan, John Calven Price, James Gile and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Ahern & Associates Limited v. Wilson et al
as 2:2014cv01379
Plaintiff:
Ahern & Associates Limited
Defendant:
Darrell Wilson , Unknown Wilson and Transportation Logistics Corporation International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv01760
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Sherry Odunsi , Arshell Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eng v. Reichardt et al
as 1:2014cv01502
Defendant:
Peter Barton, Robert Honor, David Irving and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eng
First Name Unknown:
Hollinger and Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Mayer, Bisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asher et al v. Sequoia Energy et al
as 6:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Asher , Lack Bailey, Jr. , Royal Bargo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sequoia Energy , Southern Coal Kentucky Corporation and Liggett Mining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Wilson et al v. Davis
as 3:2013cv03073
Plaintiff:
Shannon Wilson and Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Darrell Jones v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-20200
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL WILSON JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Barnett v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randall Workman, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
