Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Compton v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dillion Compton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, The TDCJ Director's Review Committe, Ronald Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairchild v. Crancer et al
as 4:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lamont Fairchild
Defendant:
Ryan Crancer, Hunter Middleton, Darryl Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Damone Williams
Defendant:
Darryl Sanders and The City of Baton Rouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. LINDENWOLD BOROUGH et al
as 1:2019cv16871
Defendant:
JANE DOES (1-30), JOHN DOE CONTRACTORS (1-20), LINDENWOLD BOROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SANDERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07161
Plaintiff:
DARRYL SANDERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Cook County et al
as 1:2015cv09410
Plaintiff:
Darryl Sanders
Defendant:
Cook County and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Sanders v. State of Nevada, et al
as 13-16557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. NEVEN, Warden and others
Sanders v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Defendant:
Lt. J. Bean, Director G. Cox, Sgt. C. Day and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Darryl Sanders v. Tamara Woolfolk, et al
as 09-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darryl Sanders
Defendant - Appellee:
Tamara Woolfolk, Ramiro Martinez, Jr., #6517, Police Officer, Nick W. Humphrey, #3691, Police Officer and others
Sanders v. Woolfolk et al
as 4:2009cv01207
Plaintiff:
Darryl Sanders
Defendant:
Tamara Woolfolk, Ramiro Martinez, Jr., Nick W. Humphey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
