Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mcconnell v. Reynolds
as 5:2026cv02892
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Petitioner:
David Allen Mcconnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Winter v. Ceresini
as 1:2026cv01387
Petitioner:
Hermione Kelly Ivy Winter, Dawud bin-Allemandi Abdulah Farooq, Miss Tiwaz and others
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMBS v. COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIONAL CARE et al
as 2:2026cv00685
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN COMBS
Defendant:
COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIONAL CARE, VIGO COUNTY SECURITY CENTER and DEREK FELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Knowles v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv02775
Plaintiff:
David Allen Knowles
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2026cv05753
Plaintiff:
David Allen
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. Sawyer et al
as 7:2026cv00737
Plaintiff:
David Allen Caldwell
Defendant:
Thomas Sawyer and John Bolling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Adkins et al
as 3:2026cv00535
Plaintiff:
John Fredrick Arnold
Defendant:
Connie Regina Adkins and David Allen Adkins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
