Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roberson v. Gadrey
as 23-10052
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy John Roberson
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Gadrey, Chief of Police, City of Rowlett Police Department, David Gill, Chief of Police, City of Mesquite and Texas Department of Criminal Appeals
Roberson v. Gadrey et al
as 3:2022cv02631
Petitioner:
Billy John Roberson
Respondent:
Michael Gadrey, David Gill and Texas Department of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03100
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Judge Peter C. Dedded, Judge Ronda Trupp, Judge David Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gills et al v. Frakes et al
as 4:2021cv03004
Plaintiff:
David Gills and Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes and Pete Ricketts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arzaga
as 3:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Arzaga
Defendant:
Arron A Katz and David Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv08230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. USA
as 1:2020cv02204
Petitioner:
David Gill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Sturgis et al
as 8:2018cv03185
Defendant:
Mark Summerville, Anthony Johnson, Captain Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Roberts v. Superior Court of California San Diego Central Division et al
as 3:2012cv01707
Plaintiff:
Eric Patrick Roberts
Defendant:
Superior Court of California San Diego Central Division, David Gill and Brian Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
