Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ahearn et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11337
Plaintiff:
Tim Auer, Alice Hughes, Val Grimes and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cynthia Stentz et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02867
Plaintiff:
David Helm and Cynthia Stentz
Special Master:
Special Master
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Synthes Inc, Johnson and Johnson Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cynthia Stentz et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08744
Plaintiff:
David Helm and Cynthia Stentz
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Albritton et al v. The City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2016cv02662
Plaintiff:
Amy Albritton and Landon Albritton
Defendant:
The City of Houston, Texas , Harris County, Texas , Harris County District Attorney Patricia Lykos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morlas v. Judge David Helms et al
as 0:2015cv61882
Plaintiff:
Jorge Morlas
Defendant:
Judge David Helms, Paul Valcore and Gabriela C. Novo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helms v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
David Helms
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Helms et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Sandra Denise Helms and Paul David Helms
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00874
Plaintiff:
VIRGIE BELL , JOANN BEVERLY , MELVIN D. CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Helms v. Ken Clark
as 10-55699
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HELMS
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
