Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brown v. Vilsack et al
as 4:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
James M Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack and David L King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
KING v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02758
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barry Livingston v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 12-10733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY E. LIVINGSTON, also known as Barry Eugene Livingston
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, JOHN H ADAMS, MICHAEL A. PARMER and others
Barry Livingston v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 12-10710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY E. LIVINGSTON, Barry Eugene Livingston
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, MICHAEL A. PARMER, GREGORY C. BOLAND and others
Livingston v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Michael A Parmer, Gregory C Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John H Adams, Michael A Parmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chubb & Son et al v. C & C Complete Services, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
Chubb & Son , Federal Insurance Company , Chubb Custom Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
C & C Complete Services, LLC , William C. Cornelius, Jr. , David L. King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 4:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
DAVID L KING
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GILO and E HAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David L. King v. Rapid American Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-64727
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation
Plaintiff:
David L. King
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
