Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Roberts v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
David Lane Roberts
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Richard Bynam and Valerie Wells
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN, REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Berry
as 2:2021cv00046
Respondent:
Warden Walter Berry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
David Lane Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGlothlin v. Langley et al
as 3:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Lane McGlothlin
Defendant:
Corporal Stanford, Sheriff Terry Langley and Captain Shane Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Marriott International Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00835
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc., Residence Inn and David Lane
Plaintiff:
Clay Arron Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGlothlin v. Carroll County Detention Center
as 3:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
David Lane McGlothlin
Defendant:
Carroll County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGlothlin v. Ryals et al
as 4:2017cv00687
Plaintiff:
David Lane McGlothlin
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Randell, Gary Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Dupont et al
as 3:2016cv00263
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, Leslie Dupont, David Lane and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 2:2015cv00038
Defendant:
David Lane and David Lain
Plaintiff:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
