Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Moss v. Director TDCJ
as 3:2014cv02358
Petitioner:
David Lynn Moss
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2014cv00065
Petitioner:
David Lynn Moss
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PECHE v. RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PECHE
Defendant:
RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PECHE v. RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PECHE
Defendant:
RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Moss v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-11059
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN MOSS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Stapleton v. Correction Corp. of America, et al
as 13-30388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN STAPLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIM KEITH, NICOLE WALKER and others
US v. David Hatfield
as 13-6451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN HATFIELD
Harper v. Harrison County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Harper
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Detention Center, Health Assurance LLC and Correctional Medical Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Harrison
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Bruce Westbrooks, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Stapleman v. Public Safety & Corrections, et al
as 13-30027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN STAPLEMAN, also known as David Stapleton
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JIMMY LEBLANC, LIBBY TIGNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
