Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
David R Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson v. Bowen
as 4:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
David R. Johnson
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Johnson v. State of Illinois
as 21-2896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID R. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Johnson v. Houghteling et al
as 1:2020cv07472
Defendant:
Gerald E. Kubasiak, Lindsay A. Valcho, Tchedy Y. Desire and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Illinois
as 1:2020cv05862
Plaintiff:
David R. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonchek v. Nicolet Unified School District et al
as 2:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Myra Taxman, Estate of David R. Johnson, Nicolet High School and others
Plaintiff:
Mark S Bonchek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Johnson and David R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Huesing v. Scottsdale Eye Surgery Center PC et al
as 2:2018cv00904
Plaintiff:
Edward L Huesing
Defendant:
Scottsdale Eye Surgery Center PC and David R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Johnson v. Warden Canaan USP
as 17-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Johnson et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Johnson and David R. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
