Cases 1 - 10 of 1,853
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Clark v. Swanson et al
as 2:2024cv10681
Petitioner:
Calvin Clark
Respondent:
Swanson and David S. Leyton
Hill v. Peoria County et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Hill
Defendant:
Peoria County, Jodi M Hoos, Jason Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. Swanson et al
as 4:2024cv10723
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent:
Christopher Swanson and David S. Leyton
Worthy v. Rodwin
as 24-1033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WORTHY
Defendant:
LISA RODWIN and DAVID S. SARKOVICS
Neal v. Barrett, et al.
as 24-2403
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant:
Secretary BARBARA M. BARRETT, FRANK KENDALL, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
Spigner et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Colomba Spigner
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shortymacknifisent v. State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, The et al
as 0:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
The State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lecia L. Shorter v. The State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02799
Defendant:
Gina Clark Keaveny, SMBC Manubank, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Lecia L. Shorter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
