Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Sharp v. 10 Roads Express, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
David Sharp
Defendant:
10 Roads Express, LLC and John Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Sharp v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06950
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY v. 10 ROADS EXPRESS, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, as Subrogee of Golden Rule Investments, LLC and David Sharp Trucking and Great West Casualty Company
Defendant:
10 ROADS EXPRESS, LLC and John Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Valenzuela et al v. Sharp et al
as 1:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Rachel Valenzuela and Miracle Boyd
Defendant:
#12950 David Sharp, #17643 Michael Wilson, #6789 Nicolas Jovanovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharpe v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
David Sharpe
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Deforge et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jerry Deforge, James Flenoury, David Sharpe and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Deforge et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jerry Deforge, James Flenoury, David Sharpe and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Sharp et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00777
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Sharp and Cathy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
