Cases 41 - 50 of 364
White v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00049
Defendant:
T. Nicely, K. Boyles, J. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23784
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVID WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Carawan, Jr. v. Brad Perritt
as 21-6789
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEST, DAVID WHITE, BRAD PERRITT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.
Torres v. City of Edinburg, Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00190
Defendant:
City of Edinburg, Texas, Richard Hinojosa and David White
Plaintiff:
Cesar Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. Smith
as 21-10231
Defendant / Appellee:
David White, Timothy R. Washington, Michael E. Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorenzo Mejia, Jr.
Mejia v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Mejia, Jr
Defendant:
Michael E Feazell, David White, Olabanji A Oladimeji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. EXCEED INSURANCE AGENCY INC. et al
as 3:2021cv03065
Defendant:
EXCEED INSURANCE AGENCY INC. and Cather Grocery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DAVID WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Exceed Insurance Agency Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03066
Defendant:
EXCEED INSURANCE AGENCY INC., CATHER GROCERY, INC., Cather Grocery Inc and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons, Ashland Federal Correctional Instutition and Allen Beard, Jr.
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
