Cases 21 - 30 of 281
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST, JOSH SCHERSCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knellinger et al v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
David Knellinger and Robert Storey
Defendant:
David (I) Young, David Young, Bianca (I) Gardelli and others
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv02193
Petitioner:
Lotus Justice and Lotus Justice, restricted
Respondent:
State of Ohio, David Young and Common Pleas Court Franklin County Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
DAVID YOUNG
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Nobilis Health
as 22-20224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zhang Yang
Defendant / Appellee:
Nobilis Health Corporation, Harry Fleming, David Young and others
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06331
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ethan Moore v. David Young
as 22-6336
Petitioner / Appellant:
ETHAN JEROME MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID YOUNG
YOUNG A.K.A SANTA FE v. SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SERVICES INDIANA
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG A.K.A SANTA FE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SERVICES INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARPENTER v. YOUNG JR.
as 3:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JOHN DAVID YOUNG JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05903
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Attorney General, State of Ohio, Bureau of Criminal Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
