Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Davison v. Anderson et al
as 3:2026cv00362
Plaintiff:
Michael Davison
Defendant:
Kristina Anderson, Rodney Torganson, Kiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEDDER v. SPOONER et al
as 4:2026cv00543
Plaintiff:
MACK R TEDDER
Defendant:
EDWARD SPOONER, JUDITH A WOLSON, JIMMIE HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVISON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 4:2026cv01295
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVISON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Archer v. Finkeldei et al
as 2:2026cv02553
Plaintiff:
Patrick David Archer
Defendant:
Brad Finkeldei, Nicholas Kent, Jeanice Kerr Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank Davison v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv05303
Plaintiff:
Frank Davison
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Davison v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv13267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Davison
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Davison v. State of Alaska Court System
as 3:2026cv00317
Petitioner:
Dennis L Davison
Respondent:
State of Alaska Court System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
