Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dejesus v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv06846
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dejesus
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DeJesus v. Woodgrain Inc.
as 1:2026cv03595
Plaintiff:
Lilian Ferreras DeJesus
Defendant:
Woodgrain Inc. doing business as Woodgrain Mills
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04702
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guerrier et al v. Bautista et al
as 2:2026cv03418
Plaintiff:
Robert Guerrier and Guerda Guerrier
Defendant:
Jordan DeJesus Sanchez Bautista and Tribeca Automotive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Felipe Olguin-Rosario v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-2436
Petitioner:
FELIPE DEJESUS OLGUIN-ROSARIO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Guerrier et al v. Bautista et al
as 9:2026cv03418
Plaintiff:
Robert Guerrier and Guerda Guerrier
Defendant:
Jordan DeJesus Sanchez Bautista and Tribeca Automotive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEJESUS v. WARDEN et al.
as 3:2026cv05632
Petitioner:
EFRAIN DEJESUS
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY - CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. Kobayashi
as 4:2026cv03849
Petitioner:
Martin DeJesus Luevano
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
