Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,434
VALDIVIA v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2024cv02522
Petitioner: GERARDO DEJESUS VALDIVIA
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT HAINWORTH, SCI-LAUREL HIGHLAND, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL M. HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEJESUS v. PODELL et al
as 1:2024cv06426
Plaintiff: KARINA DEJESUS
Defendant: MARILYN PODELL, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10 and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
US v. Bobby Haislip
as 24-6489
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BOBBY WAYNE HAISLIP, a/k/a Roberto Wayne Haislip, a/k/a Robert Wayne Haislip, a/k/a Roberto Fabian DeJesus
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff: PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. MACK et al
as 2:2024cv05918
Plaintiff: ANABEL DEJESUS
Defendant: JOSEPH H MACK, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, JOHN DOE(S) #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States v. Darragh
as 24-4049
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SEAN DEJESUS DARRAGH
Cruz v. USA
as 4:2024cv00415
Petitioner: Ivan Dejesus Suastes Cruz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Luevano
as 24-40301
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Martin Dejesus Luevano
DEJESUS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05290
Plaintiff: MARIA DEJESUS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?